The pre-suit attorney demand alleges that the insured operated on the wrong knee, then had the patient’s wife sign an additional consent form for surgery on the incorrect knee. The attorney alleges negligence, gross negligence, fraud, misrepresentation, and violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
A 44 YOM patient (6’, 210 lb) was admitted for knee surgery under the care of a surgeon. The patient was scheduled for a left knee procedure, including a scope, partial medial meniscectomy, an osteochondral autograft transplantation (OATS) procedure, and loose body excision. Prior to surgery, the patient and a witness signed a consent form for the left knee operation, with the surgeon initialing the patient’s left knee.
The operative report states that the circulating nurse, anesthesia staff, and operative staff were completing a time-out procedure as the surgeon entered the operating room. Several contributing factors complicated the defense of this wrong site surgery. The patient was in lithotomy position with the wrong knee draped. The presurgical marking on the patient’s thigh was not visible due to tight draping and was not assessed before the first incision. In addition, there was a change in anesthesia staff at a critical point after the tourniquet was applied to the wrong knee, but prior to the timeout. Further indications of a wrong-site surgery included the lack of shaving and prep and the inability to find the meniscus tear noted on the MRI. However, the surgeon did find the expected crepitus, chondromalacia, and loose bodies.
Upon recognizing the error, staff was concerned about the lack of consent. The surgeon met with the patient’s spouse and claimed he informed her that the procedure had been done on the wrong knee. He then sought consent for the performance of the arthroscopy of the incorrect knee, which was obtained. Following a discussion with the OR director, the patient’s spouse stated she learned that the initial procedure had been done on the wrong knee. Prior to that conversation, she was not aware that the first procedure had been performed on the wrong knee and believed the surgeon was asking to do the “wrong” knee based on an identified need. Only after the completion of the procedure did the surgeon become aware of the error, leading to dismay and chaos in the operating room.
Had robust risk mitigation strategies been in place, such as enhanced time-out procedures and stringent informed consent protocols, this adverse outcome might have been prevented. Here are some strategies that could have mitigated the risk.
In addition to these risk mitigation strategies, ongoing staff training and education on patient safety protocols are essential. Regular simulations and drills can help reinforce proper time-out procedures and enhance team communication.
This case of a wrong-site surgery underscores the importance of robust risk mitigation strategies in preventing adverse outcomes. By implementing enhanced time-out procedures, strengthening informed consent protocols, establishing clear lines of communication, double-checking presurgical markings, and prioritizing transparent disclosure, surgical teams can minimize the risk of errors and improve patient safety. Ongoing training and education are crucial to ensuring compliance with these protocols and fostering a culture of safety in the operating room.
---
If you have questions on this topic, please email RiskAdvisor@ProAssurance.com or call 844-223-9648.