Many states allow third parties (e.g., relatives and nannies) to consent to a minor’s medical treatment, as long as the parent’s/guardian’s authorization is already in place. Clinicians are sometimes tempted to bend the minor consent rules when the adolescent is older or when the patient comes in with a relative who appears to be a caretaker, even though that caretaker does not have legal standing to consent to the adolescent’s medical treatment. Consider the conflicting interests of the parties in the following case.
A 17-year-old patient presented to an urgent care center (UCC) with her aunt, complaining of a shoulder injury sustained during soccer practice. The aunt consented to x-rays and treatment. No attempt was made to contact the patient’s parents. Allowing relatives to consent in place of parents had been a long-standing policy at the UCC. The next day, the patient’s mother called threatening a lawsuit, claiming she would not have consented to treatment. The UCC office manager called the NORCAL Risk Management department for advice.
Unless an adolescent patient has a legal right to consent to proposed treatment, or there is a third-party authorization for consent on file for the person accompanying the minor, any non-urgent diagnostic and treatment decisions should be delayed until informed consent can be obtained from a parent/guardian.1 In general, medical care that is “necessary and likely to prevent imminent and significant harm” to a minor patient can be provided if parental consent is not possible.1 This patient’s shoulder injury would probably not be considered an emergency.
Even though the 17-year-old patient seemed mature enough to make general medical decisions independently, in this state she did not have the legal capacity to consent to treatment of her shoulder. (A limited number of states allow older adolescents to consent to general medical treatments based on various circumstances.) Were this issue to go to court, perhaps the defense team could argue that the 17-year-old patient was mature enough to consent to treatment of her shoulder injury; however, deeming older patients mature enough to consent to general medical treatment as a practice policy is unwise.1 Additionally, many states shift financial liability to the adolescent when the adolescent has consented to the treatment. Therefore, if it is appropriate for an adolescent patient to consent to anticipated treatment without parental involvement or knowledge, payment issues should be addressed up front with the adolescent.
Many states allow third-party consent to a minor’s medical treatment with parental/guardian pre-authorization. In these situations, a child’s parent/guardian may sign a statement authorizing a third party to consent to medical care if the child’s parents/guardians will not be available. When the need for third-party consent appears likely, arrangements should be made for the parent/guardian to provide a written preauthorization. Had an appropriate pre-authorization for treatment been on file allowing the aunt to consent to the patient’s medical treatment, the UCC could have accepted the aunt’s consent for the treatment of her niece.
According to the laws of the state in which the treatment took place in the foregoing case (and most other states), the treatment of this adolescent patient without parental consent would have been considered both battery and unprofessional conduct. After being provided with risk management resources and advice for establishing appropriate minor informed consent policies and procedures, this caller was referred to the Claims department to open a precautionary file in case the mother followed through on her threat to sue.
Careful planning and good office policies and procedures can prevent most situations where clinicians and staff will be tempted to treat an adolescent patient without proper consent. Consider the following recommendations:1,2
Even when a third-party consent authorization is in place, it’s wise to attempt to contact a parent to confirm consent and update the parent about the minor’s status, particularly when the patient is being treated for an injury.3
More Information About Adolescent Consent and PrivacyThe following resources provide information about additional areas of adolescent treatment that practices often find challenging relative to the consent process:
|
1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Committee on Bioethics. “Consent for Emergency Medical Services for Children and Adolescents.” Pediatrics, 2011;128(2):427-433.
2. Gary N. McAbee, DO, JD, et al. “Consent by Proxy for Nonurgent Pediatric Care.” Pediatrics, 2010:126(5)1022-1031.
3. California Hospital Association. Consent Manual 2018: 2.16. (resource not available online at time of publication)
American College of Emergency Physicians. “Consent for Medical/Surgical Care/Emergency Treatment and Child’s Medical Information.” (sample form)